Based on several official pronouncements of the leading organs of the German Evangelical Church in the past decade on the ethical and international legal implications of the use of force either as collective action under the authority of the United Nations or by individual states, the article critically reviews the positions taken by the Church with regard to their consistency over time. In the early 1990s the Council of the German Evangelical Church clearly stated that peaceful means of conflict resolution generally take priority over forceful means. However, in particular circumstances the use of force as ultima ratio cannot be ruled out. Recently, under the impact of the Iraq crisis, the positions taken were less strict. Due to a lack of a clear distinction between (illegal) unilateral uses of force and (legal) enforcement action by the United Nations it remains unclear whether the Church still unequivocally holds on to its earlier ultima ratio stance. The paper argues that in view of the new challenges posed by global terrorism all social and political forces, including the churches, have to support the United Nations as the central institution for the maintenance of international peace and security which - inter aliis - requires the acceptance of the UN's competence to use enforcement measures in cases of grave breaches of peace including massive human rights violations as ethically and legally legitimate, provided the UN itself stays within the limits of the law.

Fußnote: Evangelische Kirche in Deutschland: Schritte auf dem Weg zum Frieden. -

Enthalten in:
Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik; 2003/3 Kommentare, Studien, Berichte, Dokumentationen, Diskussionen, Rezensionen, Bibliographie (2003)

---

Serie / Reihe: Zeitschrift für Evangelische Ethik

Personen: Delbrück, Jost

Schlagwörter: Frieden Evangelische Kirche in Deutschland Stellungnahme Friedensethik Völkerrecht